This Website is discontinued. We changed to Parstoday English
Tuesday, 09 September 2014 12:02

ISIS atrocities and the US vested interests

ISIS atrocities and the US vested interests

The savage murder of US journalist Steven Sotloff has provoked justifiable anger and revulsion among millions of people around the world.

However, it is necessary not only to sympathize with Sotloff and his family, but to understand the deeper causes of this tragedy. The murder, following that of James Foley last month, is a further demonstration of both the reactionary character of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, ISIS, and the terrible consequences of a half-century of intervention in the Middle East by US imperialism. Patrick Martin, a Canadian journalist and bureau chief for The Globe and Mail newspaper, has disclosed more on the issue.

US Vice President Joseph Biden denounced the beheading of Sotloff in a speech at a naval shipyard in New Hampshire, declaring that US military forces would pursue ISIS to “the gates of hell.” But ISIS is not an incomprehensible emanation of Satanic evil, as portrayed by the Obama administration and the American media. It is a product of the policies of the US government over a protracted period of time.
US administrations have sought to build up the most reactionary, backward and so-called “Islamic” fundamentalist forces in the Middle East for many decades. Throughout the Cold War, Washington mobilized them against a kind of nationalist leaders viewed either as potential allies of the Soviet Union or as direct threats to the profits and property of American and European corporations.
The CIA financed and mobilized the 1953 coup that ousted the liberal government of Mohammed Mossadegh, which had nationalized the largely British-owned oil industry. The US cultivated similar acts in Egypt to undermine the government of Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser, who nationalized the Suez Canal and sought military aid from the Soviet Union.

The security anchor of American policy in the Persian Gulf region, particularly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution that overthrew the despotic Shah of Iran, was an alliance with the monarchy in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh has long promoted the most reactionary forms of so-called “Islamic” fundamentalism as an ideological bulwark for its dependent rule.

Dubbed as “Islamic”, the fundamentalism became directly linked to terrorist violence through the US campaign of subversion beginning in the late 1970s against the pro-Soviet government in Afghanistan. The CIA, working with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, recruited fundamentalists from all over the world, trained them in bomb-making and other terror tactics, and funneled them to the battlefield in Afghanistan. Prominent among these was the son of a Saudi construction multi-millionaire, Osama bin Laden.

The veterans of Afghanistan returned to their home countries, from Morocco to Indonesia, spreading the influence of extremism into countries where it had never before existed. A key turning point was the 1990-91 Persian Gulf war, in which half a million US troops were deployed to Saudi Arabia, prompting bin Laden to declare the United States the main enemy.

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, carried out by a group of predominantly Saudi terrorists, several of them well known to the US intelligence services, the Bush administration declared its so-called “war on terror” against the former US allies. However, this by no means signified a break with the alleged “Islamic” militants, many now operating under the umbrella of Al- Qaeda, as later events would show.

There remained a murky connection between US foreign policy and the radical militants, most notably in Iraq, Libya and Syria, three countries ruled by governments that had largely suppressed the extremist groups. The US invasion and occupation of Iraq laid waste to the country, killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and destroying the social and physical infrastructure. Employing the strategy of divide and rule, the US occupation deliberately stoked up Sunni-Shiite sectarian divisions, resulting in the growth of the Sunni-based Al Qaeda in Iraq, the forerunner of ISIS. Meanwhile, the US-NATO intervention in Libya in 2011 employed elements linked to Al Qaeda as its ground troops, leading to the current state of political disintegration and civil war in that country.

In Syria, the CIA and US allies such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia directly armed, financed and trained “Islamic” extremists, better to read non-Islamic terrorists, to fight the government of President Bashar al-Assad, which was allied to Iran and Russia. The recipients of US aid included both the al-Nusra Front, the Al Qaeda affiliate in Syria, and ISIS, which advocated an even more extreme form of terrorism than Al Qaeda, including the immediate establishment of a “caliphate” on conquered territory in eastern Syria and western Iraq.

When US President Barack Obama spoke just recently of “not having a strategy” for US intervention in Syria, he was admitting, albeit inadvertently, the contradictions in US foreign policy. ISIS now threatens the US vested interests in the region. But it remains a de facto ally of the US campaign of subversion in Syria aimed at overthrowing the elected government of President Bashar Al-Assad.

Washington is still considering how to square that circle: how to wage war against ISIS without abandoning its goal of ousting President Bashar Al- Assad, which has only become more imperative as the conflict between US imperialism and Russia over Ukraine intensifies.

In his remarks at a press conference in Estonia, President Obama denounced the crimes committed by ISIS, both the beheading of two US journalists and the slaughter of civilians and captured prisoners across northern Iraq. But Obama made no such denunciations when ISIS was perpetrating identical crimes against Syrian soldiers and civilians.

Now the late US ally against the Syrian president is being utilized to provide one last service for American imperialism: the crimes of ISIS are to be the pretext for a massive escalation of the US military intervention in the Middle East, including stepped-up bombing in Iraq and its eventual extension into Syria, and the reintroduction of US troops on an increasing scale. Only hours after the murder of Steven Sotloff, Obama ordered another 350 US troops to Baghdad, supposedly to reinforce the guard at the US Embassy, bringing the total American deployment to more than 1,100.

The US government will combine military aggression in the Middle East with intensified attacks on democratic rights at home. British Prime Minister David Cameron has already set the pace by using the threat of ISIS as the pretext for sweeping security measures on the streets of Britain and a crackdown on immigrants from the Middle East.

The people in the United States and internationally must intransigently oppose all efforts to use the crimes of ISIS as a pretext for war and repression. American imperialism, having fostered terrorism, now seeks to exploit it for its own purposes. The defeat of the fundamentalism and terrorism, like the defeat of all forms of capitalist reaction and violence, is the task of the activists and freedom-lovers, mobilized on the basis of an international program and collective efforts, and not the US militarism.


Add comment

Security code